🔗 Share this article

When I am a game master, I historically steered clear of significant use of luck during my Dungeons & Dragons games. I tended was for narrative flow and what happened in a game to be guided by player choice as opposed to pure luck. Recently, I opted to alter my method, and I'm very pleased with the outcome.

The Spark: Seeing an Improvised Tool

An influential podcast utilizes a DM who often requests "fate rolls" from the participants. He does this by selecting a specific dice and outlining possible results tied to the number. This is fundamentally no distinct from consulting a random table, these get invented in the moment when a character's decision has no clear outcome.

I decided to try this approach at my own game, primarily because it appeared interesting and provided a departure from my standard routine. The outcome were eye-opening, prompting me to think deeply about the often-debated balance between pre-determination and spontaneity in a D&D campaign.

A Memorable Story Beat

In a recent session, my group had just emerged from a massive battle. Afterwards, a cleric character inquired after two friendly NPCs—a pair—had made it. In place of deciding myself, I handed it over to chance. I told the player to roll a d20. I defined the outcomes as: a low roll, both were killed; a middling roll, only one succumbed; on a 10+, they survived.

Fate decreed a 4. This resulted in a incredibly moving moment where the characters discovered the corpses of their companions, forever holding hands in their final moments. The group held funeral rites, which was particularly powerful due to prior character interactions. As a final gesture, I chose that the NPCs' bodies were miraculously restored, showing a spell-storing object. I randomized, the item's contained spell was perfectly what the group needed to solve another pressing story problem. You simply orchestrate such perfect story beats.

Improving On-the-Spot Skills

This experience caused me to question if chance and spontaneity are truly the beating heart of tabletop RPGs. Although you are a prep-heavy DM, your improvisation muscles can rust. Groups often find joy in upending the most detailed plots. Therefore, a effective DM needs to be able to pivot effectively and create details on the fly.

Utilizing on-the-spot randomization is a excellent way to train these talents without venturing too far outside your comfort zone. The trick is to deploy them for low-stakes decisions that have a limited impact on the overarching story. To illustrate, I wouldn't use it to establish if the central plot figure is a secret enemy. But, I might use it to decide if the party reach a location just in time to see a critical event unfolds.

Enhancing Collaborative Storytelling

This technique also serves to maintain tension and foster the impression that the adventure is dynamic, progressing based on their decisions in real-time. It combats the sense that they are merely characters in a DM's sole narrative, thereby enhancing the shared nature of the game.

Randomization has historically been integral to the game's DNA. The game's roots were enamored with encounter generators, which suited a playstyle focused on dungeon crawling. Although current D&D tends to prioritizes story and character, leading many DMs to feel they require detailed plans, it's not necessarily the required method.

Achieving the Sweet Spot

It is perfectly nothing wrong with thorough preparation. But, equally valid nothing wrong with stepping back and permitting the rolls to decide some things rather than you. Authority is a major part of a DM's job. We use it to facilitate play, yet we often struggle to release it, at times when doing so could be beneficial.

The core recommendation is this: Have no fear of relinquishing a bit of your plan. Embrace a little chance for inconsequential story elements. You might just create that the unexpected outcome is infinitely more memorable than anything you would have planned in advance.